Could we see two Spider-Man movies back-to-back? News on Spider-Man 4 and 5.
According to IGN.com, a working draft of Spider-Man 4 is ready; while it’s not yet confirmed, the next two sequels (that’s right, the next two) could be shot together due to a larger and continuous storyline.
Cinnematical.com have reported the news, and, so their source claims: “The story arc has encompassed two films, making Spider-Man 5 shootable at the same time. The studio saw dollar signs and is in the process of reworking his deal to snatch up the story arc.”
Hmm, “dollar signs” indeed. Good luck getting the actors on board.
Join Us
The Girls Entertainment Network is a community that focuses on females in modern pop-culture and entertainment.
Channels
Community
Online Now
- Users: 2 Guests, 3 Bots
Sponsored:
- Anime Lyrics
- Anime Wallpapers
- Video Games Live
- Video Game Cheats
7 Responses for "Two Spider-Man movies?"
as long as they dont rush through the villians like they did last time( im lookin at you Venom) they should be able to bounce back to form.
Yeah, let’s hope so. But Spider-Man 3 still made a ridiculously amount at the box office.
I agree about the Villian issues
This was a huge problem with Batman and even in Batman Begins. Superhero movies do not need 2 Villians
One will do just fine
Luckily for Batman and Spiderman they had a large amount of SuperVillians to choose from
I didn’t think they overdid it in Batman Begins, though. I thought they balanced it out nicely. And it’s not like Scarecrow or Falcone are dead or anything (although R’as “is”)—Crane is actually coming back in the next film; Falcone, while he’s not in the cast list, did “break out of Arkham” or something, so …
Plus, Batman always has to deal with a bunch at the same time … You can’t just excluse mobsters in Gotham. It’s a little different than Spider-Man in NY, considering he mostly fights “core” villains like the Goblin, etc. … and in the day. There’s a big difference between day and night activities, too, obviously.
But they have to consider which ones are more appropriate for the big screen and which aren’t. I mean, I’m sure they could find a way, but some make more sense to include in the movies than others without getting cheesy.
I agree with Anthony. Focusing on two villains does not let you flesh out the characters well enough. What I like most about villains is that they have a lot of back story to them. Putting two in one film often means having to sacrifice certain aspects of that story to accommodate for the other villains story. If hero movies perhaps were longer than 2.5 hours, maybe it would work better. But to put all that information on the villains, and focus on the hero and alter ego, and the over all story of the film … too much attention is divided among to many parts.
Well, I sort of agree, maybe I should have clarified. Obviously in Spider-Man 3 it was just horribly done; I thought it was laid out nicely in BB.
Overloading the villains is generally a bad idea, but BB was a such a good film, I didn’t have any problems with the villains. And at least in TDK there’s only going to really be one major villain, so …
no more spidey movies!!!…
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.